Archive

Uncategorized

Tonight I have had a call from Elizabeth’s sister very upset that she is not allowed to speak to her and being told by certain staff that Elizabeth does not want any contact with her family. The staff who are denying any contact are Registered Mental Health Nurses on the ward and this is causing a lot of upset within the family. We do not believe for one minute that Elizabeth does not wish to speak to any of us and that is because whilst contact has been denied to us, Elizabeth is being kept in seclusion for a reason. Staff just stick together who on earth would disbelieve anything they say but this is what goes on in these institutions when there is something to hide and when certain professionals wish to be protected. Hiding behind confidentiality is not the first time we have come across such actions. However as I told one RMN tonight the truth always comes out in the end. So the members of staff spoken to tonight have been William and Joel or Jo. They would not give any information stating that Elizabeth said she did not want any information shared but this is what they do when they have things to cover up.

Elizabeth is still in seclusion since the 30th September and we see this as the ultimate punishment. It is also punishment as we see it to be declined contact for the family too. We have never known a hospital to decline right of contact like this to her family ever before and the reason we do not believe that it is what Elizabeth wants is because of her recent text messages to family.

Article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998. Before the Act, English law did not provide a statutory right to privacy. Article 8 is a qualified right (other rights being absolute or limited) and provides that: Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home, and his correspondence.

Article 8: Respect for your private and family life …

https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/human-rights-act/article-8…

Article 8 protects your right to respect for your private life, your family life, your home and your correspondence (letterstelephone calls and emails, for example). What is meant by private life? You have the right to live your life privately without government interference.

Your right to respect for private and family life …

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/law-and-courts/civil-rights/human…

  • Examples of Article 8 Breaches
  • Can A Public Authority Interfere with Your Article 8 Rights?
  • Next Steps
  • Other Useful Information
  • Examples of where there could be a breach of article 8 include: 1. searches and surveillance of your home 2. separation of family members including deportation or removal of immigrants 3. care or adoption orders for children and interference with your parental rights 4. compulsory medical treatment or testing 5. if you’re treated badly in a care home – if it’s severe enough this could also be a breach of article 3 6. your right to privacy at home and at work – for example, phone tapping, the monitoring of emails and int…

Article 3 protects you from:

  • torture (mental or physical)
  • inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and
  • deportation or extradition (being sent to another country to face criminal charges) if there is a real risk you will…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_3_of_the_European_Convention_on_Human_Rights

I will keep you all informed tomorrow as to whether Elizabeth is still in seclusion – this is a means of how they can stop contact because in seclusion staff can argue that a person cannot have a phone but we are increasingly concerned and it is good to question what is going on as you only have to read the files to see that professionals are trying to cover things up and are well aware that what they are doing is wrong.

So behind the provision of such “care” is my local area of Barnet Enfield and Haringey MH Trust and the CEO is Jinjer Kandola and the head of Commissioning is Peppa Aubyn and I have been speaking with Jon Robson of Enfield CCG who agrees that a CTR is necessary as how many times is the “care” of a PICU found to be totally wrong and in the community too under the community MH team when Elizabeth is said throughout the files to have Autism. The care she is getting right now on the MH ward therefore is totally wrong and seclusion is punishment and torture to someone who is forcibly drugged on drugs previously found to be allergic to against manufacturer’s instructions.

Just lately it has become impossible to get through to Elizabeth on her mobile phone. I had been receiving text messages, up until a few days ago, some of them quite disturbing then silence. I have contacted CQC in this respect. Whilst I have had virtually no contact, I have received email correspondence from RC Dr DM regarding my request to be included included at Ward Round via Microsoft Teams. The response I received was “no” .

I do think that there are some features of autism present and we did a screening assessment which suggested the same.  Over the next week our psychologist will be meeting with Elizabeth to undertake a more detailed assessment than the screening assessment allows.”  But the Autism diagnosis has not been done correctly. Nothing has been concluded and in any case any assessment where such dispute should not be undertaken by a provider funded at enormous cost by the local area. As one doctor honestly admitted “we are guided by the local area of Enfield” That says it all.

The RC (Responsible Clinician) is continuing to prescribe Paliperidone 100mg (Risperidone Depot) despite 5 drugs charts that state allergic reaction plus other correspondence. Now I have been passed over to a single point of contact namely Robin Stapely within Elysium.

We would not support any unescorted leave at the moment.  Please can you liaise with the ward regarding visits as they have the diary etc and can make the necessary arrangements – Dr DM- Corridge Ward.” DATED 01.10.2020

I have spoken to ******and although she did not say no to you attending her ward round she was very unsettled at the suggestion.  The main reason seems to be that she believes the medication is poisonous and that she does not need it. I think there is a real risk that if you attend ward round it could lead to ******* feeling more stressed and confused and I think that puts staff at potential risk. I am really keen to avoid this and I am aware that until this last week ******** had been making good progress.

It is most certainly not Elizabeth who does not want me at Ward Round.

Here are extracts of another email I have just received:

I am the Head of Social work at Thornford Park Hospital and the Lead Safeguarding Officer. It has been agreed that I will be your main and only  point of contact at the hospital moving forward to better support you and to add clarity with communication.  May I therefore ask that you direct any communication to myself and request that you no longer contact the ward or other members of the care team. I have advised all members of the care team to forward any communication to myself to which I will respond accordingly. I have advised all members of the care team to forward any communication to myself to which I will respond accordingly. That said , ******is not currently consenting to anyone from the hospital sharing information with you so I would not be able to discuss any aspect of ******** care and treatment presently.” Dated 02.10.20 I have contradictory messages.

I was also advised to contact Trish Maher of the Advocacy People. org

DEPRIVAL OF CONTACT WITH ELIZABETH

This is the pattern of what they do when a team decide to ban you from contact. We have experienced this kind of thing before at other institutions. So they have allocated a named contact and he is not around to speak to you when you phone and then Staff are instructed not to speak or give out any information to myself, family or friends. Only Robin Stapely – Head of Social Work is allowed to speak. I had found out by chance that Elizabeth was in seclusion again. I wondered if this could possibly be anything to do with the fact that her takeaway went missing and that she reacted but in these institutions I know from other former patients that staff can even incite someone to behave in such a way to justify punishment. Very disturbingly yesterday I phoned to speak to the ward and was put through to the Lead Nurse, Clare Whiting, who refused to give any information on Elizabeth who I knew was in seclusion. Today I phoned but Elizabeth has no phone to answer. The Lead Nurse, Claire Whiting told me there were witnesses listening to my conversation with her. To do this, it shows they are trying desperately to protect one another so I also had someone around as witness to my call because previously, at Cygnet Godden Green, they tried to label me as aggressive/threatening but I had a witness to state otherwise. Cygnet Godden Green then threatened me with their solicitors D A C Beechcroft ref GEW who wrote following my verbal complaint regarding their reports full of error where not even date of birth was correct prepared for court purposes. How can anything be done fairly when doctors deliberately write in inaccurate and extremely negative terms with the purpose of making someone look entirely bad and regarding failure. It took me all night to alter not just Cygnet’s Reports but other incorrect file records too such as Social Circumstances and that of Elysium, whose RC based his belief’s on Elizabeth’s character after just one initial meeting without having had any contact with family as we have been excluded from the beginning like we do not exist. Instead he turned to the RC of the local area whose reports were equally inaccurate and who has failed to work together with the family. In fact on two occasions she had been unlawfully detained under the MHA. This shows how the MHA does not protect the weak and vulnerable. To think such reports go before a court as flawed evidence where decisions are made that affect everyone’s life with what can be devastating consequences.

I am currently waiting to hear from Cygnet Godden Green as I have apparently been accused of impersonating another mother and that I was threatening so they reported me to Police and D A C Beachcroft Solicitors who sent me a threatening letter but have refused to provide the evidence. There was a witness to the conversation who has made a written statement to the contrary. I would welcome being provided such evidence of my so called impersonation of another mother so that I can insert this on my blog then everyone can make judgement but for some strange reason there is a wall of silence from Cygnet. So Cygnet please provide me with the recording so that everyone can hear my impersonation of another mother.

It has been several days now since I last spoke to Elizabeth and whilst in seclusion Elysium have the excuse that they do not allow phones for safety reasons so they say. I found out today from Claire Whiting that Elizabeth has been in seclusion since 30th September – several days held prisoner in one room and deprived of contact with friends and family as punishment. There was mention of an incident on the ward but anything can be said of anyone in there and it is so hard to believe a word they say because of the enormous inaccuracy of what is written in their records. I have acquired records full of error many times before containing completely untrue comments where professionals rip not just the patient but their family to shreds behind your backs. If such an incident mentioned did occur then this disputes the fact that any progress whatsoever is being made with Elizabeth and that she is improving. Therefore the care being provided under Enfield is a complete and utter waste of public money. Elizabeth was not held in seclusion under Cygnet Godden Green where not one incident was recorded neither at St Pancreas Hospital Ruby Ward so what on earth is going wrong at Elysium Thornford Park since I have the most disturbing text messages and now all of a sudden they are depriving contact? Perhaps Robin Stapely would like to respond via my blog so that everyone can hear. I don’t know what Elysium’s seclusion policy is but I just obtained that of Enfield via my FOI request plus the cost of Cygnet which works out to c£28K for 5 weeks. Time and time again Suffolk Ward/Chase Farm Hospital Enfield have sent my daughter away out of area to similar PICU facilities completely the wrong environment as they do not have any decent facility or care provision locally. It is obvious that the treatment of Paliperidone depot is clearly NOT WORKING. The correct environment would be one of peace and tranquility with staff who have the skills to communicate effectively as with Autism someone has a different way of communicating that is not understood by MH professionals.

It was mentioned at a recent meeting Procyclidine was offered but declined by Elizabeth. This is for Parkinsons Disease so perhaps Elizabeth should have a full and thorough physical examination done. She is now a size 22 and this is because she has no freedom and is being held like a prisoner.

Elizabeth is described as being cold and aloof by the RC who does not know her. These highly qualified professionals do not appear to have communication skills for autism and LD and I can’t wait until the mandatory training comes into effect through the Oliver McGowan Foundation and this is why Elizabeth is not being treated fairly or humanely.

Since Elizabeth has been at Elysium I have experienced both good and bad communication with staff. Some have put the phone down and some have been very rude. I have thought that what hope is there when some of these professionals cannot even communicate with me nicely.

When I phoned recently to enquire about a takeaway I had ordered costing nearly £30 had been received by Elizabeth communication was not good initially. The Thai takeaway restaurant in Newbury insisted they had delivered it but Elizabeth never received it. Now I have a photo as evidence. What I did not know was that Elizabeth was in seclusion at the time as my order was on the 1st October and she was placed in seclusion on the 30th September – it’s been several days now that she has been held in seclusion and to think this is the care Enfield are providing and paying a fortune for.

I had a conversation this morning with Clare Whiting, Lead Nurse about seclusion being punishment which she strongly denied. It has become very clear that the care/treatment offered by Elysium is not working at all otherwise why would she be in seclusion all this time. She went on to say that Elizabeth was well looked after and received all her meals whilst in seclusion. That is of no consolation whatsoever when contact to/by family is clearly being deprived and seclusion is deprival of contact. When this happens it makes you think further afield and I am thinking back to Cambian when exactly the same thing regarding contact was experienced.

Elizabeth in my opinion is not being treated well by Elysium. They are by far the most restrictive institution of all regarding leave and access to family. Our visits have been intrusive because we are treated like criminals with every word recorded. No quality time alone has been allowed whilst Elysium exercise complete control over Elizabeth and this control can of course affect someone’s behaviour. Control is deprival of their human rights under Art 8 with the pretence that this is what the person wants ie does not want anything discussed when that person has written very contradictory comments. It is a means where staff try desperately attempt to shielf/protect themselves sticking together when they know full well they are giving a drug previously found to be allergic to and contraindicated. No lessons have been learned by the case of Oliver McGowan. Seclusion and deprival of contact is done through isolation/coercion and gaslighting. It is evil what is going on in the UK.

I have requested a CTR from the local area of Enfield. Care at Elysium Thornford Park is clearly not working and this whole situation is affecting the entire family when we have no contact. Under their care it must be questioned as to why no MRI or investigation into the PCOS or cyst in her head plus hormone issues have not looked into as this was discussed at a previous tribunal.

Care at Cygnet cost £28K for 5 weeks so now I am waiting for a FOI to see how much the rest of the care has cost since May 2020 when nothing whatsoever has been right for Elizabeth and every single RC including the current says a PICU is not the right environment. Enormous money has been wasted and this must surely be of public interest because in my local area funding is often deprived to voluntary organisations such as Carers Group, Disability Action who do a good job in the community so why is so much money being wasted? Why aren’t families listened to?

Elizabeth wants to be with another team so why is this being ignored when her needs are NOT BEING MET UNDER ENFIELD COMMUNITY REHAB – a MH team. That was clear from a recent meeting. There are many more doctors stating Autism, one stating brain damage, another two stating complex PTSD. What a waste of money when someone like Elizabeth is not getting the right care in the right environment and is becoming more and more traumatised.

You as a parent are left feeling hopeless. I have offered to move in to Elizabeth’s flat so she is not alone. I have offered to stay with her overnight so she can go to a care farm during the day in Norfolk for respite.

How comes an entire team at Elysium getting paid a lot of money from the local area cannot manage my daughter hence punishment of seclusion lasting days on end when a single former MH nurse could take Elizabeth into her own home, take her on holiday and then onto Australia. The wonderful organisation of Working to Recovery tried to help my daughter and Elizabeth came back well. My only regret was that she ever came back to my dreadful local area of Enfield where we as a family have received nothing but bullying and lack of support. If we are experiencing this then you can imagine what is going on to someone like Elizabeth held prisoner in the name of “care”. My only hope is that she will be moved out of this institution as soon as possible and that she receives a complete review of her treatment. Nothing fair will be accomplished under Elysium in terms of diagnosis assessment and the matter of family being denied. How can anything be done fairly when Elysium are receiving so much money from the local area to keep her like a prisoner when what is needed most of all is an assessment for the autism completely independently done and there are already two reports stating complex PTSD and poss LD.

When certain doctors do not budge on diagnosis preferring to ignore the bulk of doctors who disagree as well as manufacturer’s instructions/advice when evidence of allergy this can lead to terrible injury and death and Elysium are fully aware of this.

Having spoken to Jeremy, Bethany’s Dad there is a glimmer of hope that a CTR (I had never heard of before) might bring some changes for the better in order that the right kind of help is given rather than a secure prison style environment. I am pleased to hear that Bethany is getting such decent care through Merseycare when not so long ago she was held in seclusion and fed through a hatch. It makes you wonder why other areas cannot offer the same care as Merseycare or Working to Recovery and that is not to keep someone a prisoner, but treat them with dignity and respect and recognise that families are important and that someone like my daughter cannot stand a noisy environment and loves animals. Why can’t these so called highly qualified professionals understand this simple fact that what is being provide and what treatment they are giving is wrong.

ENFIELD AND BARNET MENTAL HEALTH TRUST (jinjer Kandola CEO) This area has consistently deprived anything decent in terms of care. My complaint through Pals has come to a standstill and have sent my daughter far away from home and family to a prison facility PICU for the third time in between seclusion after seclusion dished out in punishment by various doctors where she has no contact with her family for days on end where none of us can speak to anyone apart from currently Robin Stapely who is Lead Social Worker. This is the person who, according to his email, has control over what staff can say and what information can be divulged and has dictated to my family/myself we cannot phone the ward. He is therefore depriving contact in breach of Art 8 HRA. I was told today that daily reviews of Elizabeth’s seclusion are being given by the MDT of Elysium but this is of no consolation as, under Elysium’s care, Elizabeth seems to be deteriorating so scrutiny needs to come outside sources and not by ENFIELD AND ELYSIUM in order that a fair picture can be gained totally independent . In order to thoroughly investigate then the person to be interviewed should be Elizabeth without members of staff being present.

The effect of her care/treatment and seclusion is having a devastating on myself and others right now. Certainly without doubt this is affecting my physical health, having had a major operation in January following stroke. I can honestly say that it is lack of communication and the way I and other family members are being treated that is contributing detrimentally in this connection.

These professionals employed by organisations such as Elysium and Cygnet have their jobs to think of so that comes before the wellbeing of a vulnerable patient as you only have to look at the parents fighting for justice when their sons/daughters end up dead in such organisations to question the motives behind some of these professionals regardless of their high qualifications and whether or not they went to university.

It is 5.39 am and I like other parents/carers who have a son/daughter trapped in a system that fails consistently to provide the right solution are tortured by the fact that no-one cares to listen.

There is a glimmer of hope that my daughter who, not only is Autistic but said to have some learning disability, may be treated favourably by a CTR Review panel but if she is not I will continue to turn to social media and be outspoken in continuing to write about her treatment as the word “independent” means nothing to me whatsoever.

In all these years, I knew nothing about CTRs. It has been worth me going on to social media, being outspoken and coming into contact with other parents who, instead of organisations supposed to advise, have given me the most help and greatest advice I could ever wish for.

Tribunal after Tribunal after Tribunal (closed secret courts) I have called for openness and transparency into the secret courts that taxpayers fund and have written to the President of the Courts & Tribunal service recently.

A vulnerable person right now due to Covid is spared the ordeal of facing a panel in front of her firing questions, however this is now carried out on line and it is a great ordeal to have to listen to comments by professionals who fail to liaise with the family and get a true and accurate picture of everything and so their reports are highly inaccurate, written purposely to fail a tribunal. We have seen this time and time again. A panel consists of a Judge, a lay person and an independent doctor and then sometimes another independent Dr can be appointed to prepare a report by the vulnerable person’s solicitors. The current system is tremendously flawed. Tribunals are often conducted unfairly and do not take into account the full picture. When Doctor after Doctor writes in the most biased and negative terms who is a tribunal going to believe? The last person is the parent and carer of the vulnerable person who is of great value to providers of private facilities who wish to hold on to them as they are getting paid a fortune when a patient is sent out of area away far away from home and family due to failure of the local area (in this case is ENFIELD) to provide anything appropriate which includes decent facility or provide humane care and treatment.

Here are my ratings of everything that has been provided so far:

Bethlem Royal Hospital National Psychosis Unit:

A facility where vulnerable people who are treatment resistant are sent from all over the Country, hence few visitors because many parents cannot visit if too far away. The vulnerable person is therefore more vulnerable than ever and prescribed drugs, which in Elizabeth’s case are beyond BNF levels in fact according to the files 2 x bnf level. I have also heard reports of one case where a patient was bribed with money to try a drug so there is much experimentation going on in this institution that had a museum in the grounds. This raises lots of questions – why do Doctors prescribe at 2 x bnf levels? Why do they favour Clozapine when this is a highly dangerous drug? Why was there no ECG machines working when Elizabeth was gravely ill and emergency doctors were called out? – the extremely low mews score suggested “critical”. Why was I suddenly denied visiting rights to my daughter? Why was suddenly she denied outside leave? – well I can answer the two latter questions myself. Why was they had put her on Clozapine against her advance declaration. “its all about Clozapine here you should have done your research” so I was told. They deprived freedom and deprived visiting and failed to provide a visitor’s room when I turned up with Elizabeth’s cat yet they allowed a visit by a man who turned up drunk and bringing alcohol onto the ward and was escorted off the ward drunk.

My rating 0 out of 10 for this so called renowned facility.

Cambian St Teilo House S.Wales 1 out of 10

Set in a beautiful scenic area of S. Wales I naively hoped that in Wales the care would be better. My daughter’s first reaction was “Mum it is lovely here – there are sheep outside my window. Whoever thought of such wonderful care. However, these thoughts disappeared the longer she spent in this facility, the less hope. The Psychiatrist, also a GP, so I was told tried to influence Elizabeth against myself as a mother. Dr AW was advising she concentrated on the rest of the family according to Elizabeth’s sister. This meant that I as a mother was not given the same visiting rights as the rest of the family, being her father and grandparents. This also meant that the Doctor who had all the power could stop phone calls and dictate that there should only be supervised phone calls at a time when her mother could not ring. Thank God I had solicitors appointed as NR at the time. Working together they sought to displace me as NR which they failed to do at the Bethlem because whilst work court papers were forwarded on my work computer and I was bullied into accepting a S3 which I as NR did not agree with. They had achieved what they set out to – putting her on Clozapine but now they wanted to cut a mother out and displace her with her father and this is how they destroy and damage a family. My local area were involved and Todd and Co Solicitors were appointed by me to investigate and all investigations led back to ENFIELD COMMUNITY REHAB TEAM.

I would give a rating of 1 out of 10 for this facility as Elizabeth was at least surrounded by a nice area but at Xmas she was refused leave to come home as she was deemed to be supposedly too ill but yet a visit was permitted just prior to Xmas and flanked by two nurses they brought her home for just a few hours. The nurses who brought her down for a family visit were ordered not to leave in my case yet I have the files to prove that more leave was granted to the rest of the family who, whilst concerned about the decline of Elizabeth on contra indicated drugs of Clozapine/Metformine, never complained and so this is why they got greater benefits of leave by Dr AW who suddenly disappeared into thin air after maternity leave and following my phone call with Mr Asaria from Head Office based up the road from where I worked in Fulham Reach. By the way I found out that Metformine should only be prescribed by an Endocrinologist off label. I challenged Section 3 with a brilliant report written by Dr Bob Johnson who deserves the highest award for his honesty and achievements “complex PTSD requiring intensive trauma therapy” was the diagnosis which was given by him and we thoroughly agree after reading the files and noting all the serious incidents that have occurred under care.

Phoenix House Stepping Stones care home Northampton

A care home who at first were very nice and accommodating and allowed visits/leave but Elizabeth was quite ill and suffered severe anxiety and panic attacks leading to great concern. Rated “good” by CQC this care home was far from good. I requested home leave and Elizabeth sat in the garden with a winter’s coat on – her hands were like blocks of ice yet it was a hot sunny day. I became concerned for her physical health and wellbeing, especially because she did not seem to be happy. She later told me that she had been asked to choose who was the next of kin which she did not think was fair – to have to choose between her Mum and Dad and that is cruel abuse by so called professionals who must have been Registered MH nurses to have been allowed to work in this facility. Funded by my local area of Enfield, this care home was meant for life and it became clear that all of a sudden the leave first granted was not something they wished to continue, or contact. My instincts were proven correct when I eventually obtained the files. They realised that Elizabeth had been discharged not on a CTO and by stating who do you want as next of kin they really meant NR as their intention was to place Elizabeth on CTO and I was told “we are not speaking to you – you are not the next of kin Mr Bevis is”. They gave the game away and I immediately knew what they were up to. When Elizabeth came home and complained that she was being put under pressure to choose between Mum and Dad I asked if she was happy at the care home to which she replied “no”. I then asked if she would like to stay at home to which she replied “yes” so I said she could stay at home. Then followed the most bullying I have ever in my life encountered and after 4 days deprival of Clozapine (FOUR DAYS NOT TWO AS I KEPT A DIARY) hence my story of “Get Her Back We are Paying for That” which is about out treatment at the time when I tried everything to get the Clozapine when no doctors, no chemists would help in Enfield and a case of “Deprival of Medication – Community Care” Irwin Mitchell. When I refused to return her to the care home though offered to go and collect the drug, this resulted in CoP action brought about by social services who even tried to stop contact. I would like to praise highly the CoP who did not see in our favour otherwise Elizabeth would have been returned to a care home where she had no food at the weekend as documented in the files. My rating 0 out of 10 is because her life was put at risk by staff who are would you believe RMN’s “it is more than my job is worth to give you the drug” – the response to my asking if I could collect it in person.

Cygnet Stevenage

A facility that looks like a prison and has a caged garden. Elizabeth’s carer was banned from visiting. Elizabeth was doing ok off all medication until they introduced Aripiprazole. I was so concerned that this was a facility that could have lasted years on end and where Elizabeth could become hopelessly trapped. The visits were not restricted to the point of other similar facilities with staff listening to every single word. But possessions were restricted and you were searched on arrival and had to wear alarms round your necks. We were at least allowed the dignity of a visitor’s room on the ward itself without a member of staff sitting there taking notes and the Section 2 did not increase to a Section 3 thankfully and Elizabeth was discharged back home. My main criticism is that they raised the drug Aripiprazole to double, making her unstable prior to being released back home. 2 out of ten is my mark as at least they let her go and we were allowed to visit without a member of staff standing over us.

Mays Cottage – care provided by Craegmoor part of the Priory Group. A house where Elizabeth was placed after an incident at home and following a two week stay at Premier Inn Enfield Island Village where Elizabeth was moved from room to room because of the fact no funding was put in place and the family had to pay to top up so Elizbeth could remain there. The Police Dr halved the drug Aripiprazole. Social services based at Park Ave came up with a permanent residence – a house occupied by a drug dealer who supplied Cannabis. Imagine staff arriving for work in the morning to the smell of Cannabis. Care was provided during the day only and there was a faulty lock due to shoddy repair work meaning Elizabeth was put at risk by their request for her to sleep on the settee until staff arrived in the morning. Safeguarding was carrying on against myself behind my back until luckily I found 2 copies of the minutes on the floor and I won the case because both Trust and Council were found to be in breach of their own Code of Conduct as Elizabeth had no advocate present and were forced to apologise by the Ombudsman – to think 9 professionals (3 from Craegmoor – part of the Priory Group ) sitting round a table inc. the GP with a Police minute taker and Elizabeth was unrepresented. I had no choice but to report everything to the Police myself.

2 out of 10 is my score.

Cygnet Beckton – supposed to be the Flagship of all Cygnets but we were never allowed a visit on the ward itself and given a tiny visitor’s room where a member of staff sat outside making notes after notes. Luckily the section did not go beyond section 2.

I would give 3 out of ten for this as I think looking back at least the RC did not raise the drugs too high and listened re the P450 liver enzyme test results “poor/non metaboliser”.

Trent Ward Edgware – I would give 4 out of 10 as they listened re the P450 Liver Enzyme test results and allowed Elizabeth to go out in the local area without being escorted.

Reservoir House Oakwood – a new permanent residence with no key ever provided – a form of Dol because if Elizabeth stayed out too late there would be noone to let her in as staff would be asleep. Also no furniture just a room where Elizabeth’s possessions was kept in bin liners. A persisting bed bug problem led to be contacting health and safety inspectors which led to her eviction thank God. A Death Plan had been made cutting out her family and for this reason I would give them 0 out of 10. The Death Plan asked how she would like to be buried or cremated and what music would she like played at her funeral. It was disgusting that Elizabeth had been given this to complete without any advocate present or consideration to her family. BY THE WAY ELIZABETH SAID SHE WANTS TO BE RESUSCITATED.

Huntercombe Roehampton (PICU) – sent Out of Area Dr HM of Suffolk Ward 3 out of ten – highly inaccurate report with not even date of birth correct failure to provide leading to ICO having to force them to provide as was needed for court purposes.

This facility I would rate low as Elizabeth was so drugged up she spent most of her time asleep and they drugged her on drugs previously found to be allergic to ie Risperidone. Her eyes were like slits and she had to lay down when I visited. Visiting was by appointment but at least unrestricted and more dignified but the drugging was the most I had seen apart from at Bethlam (BEDLAM). Nevertheless I would give them 3 out of ten for telling Elizabeth she had Aspergers and to have received that call whilst at work made me so happy as Elizabeth was happy.

In a short space of time spanning from June to date Elizabeth has been sent to three PICUS and held in seclusion by Chase Farm Hospital for up to 4 days at a time. Starting with:

Seclusion by Chase Farm Enfield

Ruby Ward St Pancreas Hospital – 0 out of ten.

The RC did not want me involved in any ward round and injected Elizabeth with a drug he knew to be allergic to – the equivalent of Risperidon Dr NS was RC

Seclusion by Chase Farm Enfield again

Cygnet Godden Green – 0 out of ten

“Requires Improvement” – virtually no contact for a long while – later found out phone broken but not advised. Only 1 person who communicated well. Depot injections continued despite RC RS knowing they were contra indicated and prev found allergic to.

Report writing the worst I have ever seen apart from Huntercombe where not even date of birth correct

Bullying the worst I have ever had with their solicitors threatening me and Police contacted when I dared to complain about their report writing geared to failing the tribunal.

After my blog a visit was accommodated and three hours leave granted for Elizabeth to come out unescorted.

I would praise Tom Higa for communicating nicely with me.

I would also state that Cygnet compensated for the broken phone.

5 weeks of restrictive 1 -1 15 minute watch care

My daughter’s comments “I will never get better in here”

Seclusion by Chase Farm yet again

Elysium Healthcare Thatcham BerkshireMy rating is pending whether they carry out a proper Assessment into Autism and if as I understood this was something they could not do then this would need referral to experts in the field.

Described as cold and aloof and lacking in insight with thought insertion by the RC Dr DM I do not have much good to say except this is the most restrictive care I have every come across. Also little understanding of Elizabeth as family excluded so far.

After quite a few weeks of incarceration, the only leave permitted is escorted with staff listening and writing down every word which is absolutely dreadful. I am not sure if garden leave is escorted too but know that Elizabeth is not taking the garden leave but stuck indoors and this is worrying as after spending much time like this at Cambian she suffered from Agoraphobia.

Whilst visiting has been allowed in their Board room off the ward itself, the visiting has been degrading as there is no dignity with staff listening to every single word.

Garden leave not granted despite being promised resulting in more degrading treatment to her family who have little contact but at least here unlike Cygnet Godden Green she is allowed her phone. Having said this reception is terrible and I do not like speaking on their phone and just lately the phone is constantly in the office charging which means it is difficult to get through to her. Elizabeth is getting no exercise which prompted me to complain and yet they have a gym facility.

She is getting no fresh air hardly and rarely goes out only allowed garden leave.

Not once have I or any family members had any feedback or been included in a ward round. You are treated like nothing. It is like you do not exist.

Not all staff have been polite. Phone put down on me a couple of days before.

An important report labels Elizabeth as cold and aloof. Elizabeth is missing animals and has adopted a pet spider she found in a cupboard. She talks often of the pigeons she misses in her flats.

I would describe this facility provided by Enfield CCG as the ultimate prison and the Doctor in charge has further labelled Elizabeth’s character as cold and aloof and that is because he chooses to ignore her family going by a doctor’s report from the local Ward Suffolk who lacks insight and failed to engage with family throughout sending her from one PICU to another, all of which have failed to provide anything of the right kind of environment she needs to be in to fee; well ie, fresh air, to be amongst animals.

I wish Elizabeth had never come back to Enfield. If I had never seen her again I would be happy knowing she was free rather than be incarcerated in a prison environment . Now as it stands we hardly see her anyway and when we do it is so very degrading.

So this is another private hospital, Elysium that costs around £700 per night and the RC does not recommend anything other than restricted incarceration yet cannot provide even a proper assessment whilst they desperately try to stick with the label Schizophrenia that we do not agree with.

My rating is also low for this reason that they cannot/have not provided an assessment on autism yet admit autism traits. There is so much conflict of opinion by other professionals and none of us in the family can accept this as an excuse and if a facility cannot assess they that assessment needs or rather should be done externally/independently as after all there is huge conflict of interest when facilities such as this are “guided” by the local area and it is after all being paid for by the local area. So therefore such hospitals back the local area in everything including treatment/labelling which is far from satisfactory and I am broadcasting this because this is how patients die when doctors do not listen and ignore the drugs charts.

Forced Paliperidone depot injections given and even more worrying attempts to add procyclidine for Parkinsons Disease but Elizabeth refused it. I believe this is given to hide the effects of the drug Paliperidone that can result in tardive dyskinesia and of course am aware that if a patient displays signs of tardive dyskinesia then the drug should be stopped. I obtain advice from leading professors on the drugs and that is how I have become knowledgeable and able to question what they are doing and why but some doctors when questioned look to the floor. It is as though they know what they are doing is wrong.

There is no way we as a family can accept this label as it hides the fact that in one local facility – supported housing – Elizabeth was terribly abused and has never got over it.

Xmas 2019 Elizabeth applied to Integrated Learning Disability and asked for my help in her application to them as she got nowhere every time she visited they had no record of her application. When finally the form was submitted a Dr HK refused to even see her stating her needs were being met by the MH team. This was far from true.

The majority of professionals have no idea how to communicate with someone who has autism/LD. Elizabeth wanted to be with a team who could communicate with her effectively, who understood her. Another reason why such facilities as PICU/acute wards are unsuitable is that they are very noisy and Elizabeth has sensory issues that make such noise unbearable.

It is a post code lottery and I have not come across people apart from a couple examples of support workers at a previous scheme who possess the unique communication skills but if everyone possessed such skills like Baroness Hollins then I would not be writing this blog and giving my ratings of facilities that one after the other have failed to provide both correct environment or tackled the underlying trauma which has been increased when someone is sent away from home and family time and time again and placed in such restrictive facilities where punishment is forced injections and seclusions and sanctions placed by doctors (who even admit a PICU is wrong environment) who have no understanding and do not wish to properly assess as it is more convenient to them to continue with current treatment and of course they do not wish to appear to be negligent which they are.

Until the court service/system of law is changed in the UK people like my daughter will continue to face lengthy incarceration leading to more and more desperate parents being outspoken on social media and facing in some cases bullying and threats like I have encountered. Tribunals and secret courts need to be open and transparent in my opinion and I have requested this to be looked into.

Elysium Healthcare

Registered address:

2 Imperial Place

Maxwell Road

Borehamwood

Hertfordshire

WD6 1JN

Elysium Healthcare – Private Hospital

Here at Elysium Healthcare we bring together a unique approach to the delivery of care where the individual is embedded in the heart of all aspects of care. Together, with all our stakeholders, we shape the care of today and the future.

Once again Elizabeth has been sent out of area from Suffolk Ward.   The local area of Enfield and Trust responsible is Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust and Enfield CCG has been funding this and previous private PICU placements as Elizabeth has failed to settle on Suffolk Ward where she has been held in seclusion for several days in a row.  Whilst in seclusion Elizabeth has to stay in a small room but was allowed a fan – no contact with her family was permitted whilst the team looked for a bed far away from home.  

Elizabeth is now at Elysium Healthcare  Thornford Park, Crookham Hill, Thatcham, Berkshire, RG19 8ET.  She is on Corridge Ward.  This is what the facility looks like from the outside before you go to reception.  Corridge Ward is to the right of these high fences.  The RC is Dr DM who I have never met in person. 

Enfield are lacking in facilities and only have 1 female ward under MH at  Chase Farm Hospital, Enfield –  the rest either all male or mixed.  Attempts were made to put Elizabeth on the mixed ward but she reacted, being a multiple abuse victim under care who is fearful of men.  I told them not to place her on the mixed ward but no-one listened.  She then had to spend several days in the Section 136 suite as there were no beds on the female only acute ward Suffolk.

On Suffolk Ward on at least three occasions Elizabeth has spent much of her time in seclusion.     The current treatment is Paliperidone (Risperidone depot) which is against Manufacturer’s advice as well as contra-indicated to her physical health.   At least four doctors have chosen to ignore the drugs charts with a line put through it and know that she was previously found to be allergic to this drug, also that her diagnosis is in dispute.  From the very beginning a Doctor said “Aspergers”.  There has been conflict of opinion for so long now but some doctors choose to ignore this and because of the treatment they prescribe they wish to stick with Paranoid Schizophrenia to justify the current depot, which most certainly does not seem to be having any good effect whatsoever judging by what they have written.  

Yesterday there was a very important meeting and Elizabeth had to sit through it and answer questions.  The meeting went on for hours followed by yet another meeting.   Meetings are something that Elizabeth finds an enormous ordeal as she has communication difficulty and her words are often twisted by professionals to make her look bad and professionals under MH do not seem to have understanding of Autism/LD.    

During such meetings, a patient’s character is ripped to pieces by professionals who choose not to engage with the family or invite the family to join in for instance ward rounds.  It is like we do not exist.  At such meetings the behaviour of a patient is discussed indepth – it is like gaslighting and so cruel because without input from the family professionals write biased reports and do not know the background, especially when for the most part records are so erroneous.    The system is not fit for purpose and vulnerable people not treated fairly at all.

Not once have I ever been invited to ward round.   I was excluded by Dr NS of Ruby Ward.

I was excluded from ward round by Dr RS of Castle Ward Cygnet Godden Green.

Up until now I have been excluded from ward round at Corridge Ward, Elysium Healthcare, Thornage Park, Thatcham, Berkshire.  It has been said though they are starting to have meetings via Microsoft Teams and that they would look into including me but it is a pity this was not offered in the first place in order to gain insight into my daughter’s background instead of labelling her as cold and aloof.

I have managed to obtain some extremely negatively written paperwork from Cygnet Godden Green.   It would appear current treatment is not working otherwise why on earth would such Doctors write in such a negative manner and worse still, the records are contradictory in opinion ie, some saying no incidents and others listing a string of incidents on the ward.  There is conflict of opinion between the Clinical Lead and RC on diagnosis and not even date of birth correct   Why continue with treatment they know to be wrong and detrimental to Elizabeth’s health which does not seem to be working in the slightest bit.   By far the worst hospital to write dreadful negative comments is Cygnet Godden Green and I have never read such errors in my life before and spent all night long correcting them.    When I phoned, witnessed by a member of family, next thing I was threatened quite badly but this is currently under investigation and I am waiting to hear from solicitors so I cannot comment for now.    

Presently,  all of a sudden so it would seem a disturbing trend has emerged.   I cannot visit often as Elizabeth has been sent out of area by Enfield but we are having trouble getting through on the phone.  Tonight it has been a nightmare.  The phone always appears to be charging in the office and then you have to phone the ward and wait to be put through.   When I visited Elysium last it was very hot and sunny, unbearably hot in fact and Elizabeth was not allowed out in the sunshine because no leave was granted, apart from visits which took place in the Boardroom.  I felt this was by far the most restrictive facility I have ever come across compared with all other  institutions she has been sent to so far.

You expect on the first occasion in these private institutions that someone would not be allowed out and your visit be closely monitored but I have never seen anything like this before.   During my time of visiting, one member of staff just came into the room, sat down opposite until I commented to the effect would she mind to sit outside.  Surely a patient is entitled to some privacy during a visit.  So the member of staff obliged and sat outside the room listening and writing notes all the time, then another member of staff took over, then a further member of staff so three members of staff all writing notes and recording every single word were involved.

When you arrive at Elysium first of all you have to report to reception then you have to deposit anything that appears on their restrictive list and place the items in a locker.  You are not allowed to bring in mobile phones etc.

The visiting room at Elysium is a Board Room not right on the actual ward itself so you cannot come onto the ward like you could do in Huntercombe Roehampton and Cygnet Stevenage, just the building.   

Because of distance I decided to stay overnight in the area and they did allow more than one visit but every one was very restricted and it was uncomfortable not to have privacy and decent time to spend with Elizabeth.   On the last day I proposed to visit  there was a mix-up and I never got to meet the RC, Dr DM, who was supposed to be back from holiday, as  advised. There was a right muddle on the last day and it was touch and go I was even allowed to visit at all that was how bad it was.  The message was not passed on to the Doctor that I wanted to see him or else he did not wish to see me perhaps and had suddenly left when I arrived.  Again this meeting was held in the Board Room.

I have since visited, this time with Elizabeth’s sister and was promised garden leave but when we got there,  nothing was mentioned in their records and I had brought a takeaway and we did not wish to sit in the board room.  The member of staff had to go out of their way to ask permission but we were still not allowed in the garden.   All we could do was sit outside and there was only two chairs so I told Elizabeth’s sister to take one and Elizabeth the other whilst I stood.  To be fair staff did put themselves out to bring a chair for me to sit down but it was still upsetting to be treated this way when we had travelled a fair distance to visit and were looking forward to the garden leave.  I have since discussed this with the Responsible Clinician and told him that I considered Elysium to have the most restrictive care I have ever come across.    Dr DM then said to let him know when I wanted to visit next so that he would put something in place.  However, I wrote to him to say that leave should be put on their records anyway, bearing in mind the length of time she had spent there and not just on the spur of the moment, and I questioned that surely leave should be increased by now.

I also told Dr DM of our problems getting through to Elizabeth on the phone and that the reception for mobile phones on the ward is not good.  We were concerned to note that during our visit, her finger nails were yellow, she was not getting exercise and she had piled on a lot of weight but apparently they had a gym she had never been taken to and I was told this would be considered.  

My biggest concern is that I am aware  no proper assessment has been completed for autism yet they say  Elizabeth was at fault here but if such an assessment was done in one go, no wonder why, as this would be too much for her.

Cygnet Godden Green’s conflicting reports did mention Autism but the reports were flawed with many errors and highly inaccurate and they contradicted themselves.  It was astonishing that a private hospital could produce such flawed paperwork where they could not even agree on  diagnosis, not even date of birth was correct.

Dr DM has also mentioned Autism and was questioned as to whether a certain procedure in assessment had been carried out which it hadn’t so the assessment is inconclusive and the label of  “paranoid Schizophrenia” we all disagree with has stuck because the Autism assessment had been abandoned. so it would seem.  To stick with Paranoid Schizophrenia is for convenience sake more than anything else as they are prescribing Paliperidone depot, a drug  licensed for schizophrenia that Elizabeth was previously found to be allergic to.

Elysium’s facility is surrounded by high fences and looks like a prison.  It is a secure facility and patients are not allowed out unescorted and I witnessed two members of staff escorting one patient for a short walk.  It would seem that Elizabeth does not go out at all but has now has been granted garden leave.    Perks like this are given as reward for good behaviour like in prison.  If you behave you will have leave.  If you do not behave you will be forcibly injected and thrown into the seclusion room.  

At Cygnet Godden Green Elizabeth was followed everywhere by staff and was put on 1-1 and 15 minute watch.  She could not even make a phone call in peace at least on HER phone which was only used about once and I visited out of concern as I am paying for a contract only to learn that the phone had been broken so no wonder why we hardly had contact from Elizabeth.   Cygnet did reimburse the cost of a replacement.

Just lately we have had difficulty in getting through to Elizabeth on her phone at Elysium so tonight I phoned the ward 3 times.  The first time I was told the phone was charging in the office.   The second time a female nurse put the phone down on me prompting me to ring again.  Staff offered to bring their phone but I said in each case I wanted to speak to Elizabeth on her phone.  Three phone calls later and all I got to speak to Elizabeth was on their phone.

It is a pity in the UK we do not have the kind of care in Norway – the law is completely wrong in the UK and it is abusive to forcibly drug a patient, pinning them down and some are not even resisting.   The law in the UK does not protect patients and the system needs complete review.

https://www.mentalhealthexcellence.org/forced-drugging-with-antipsychotics-is-against-the-law-decision-in-norway/

According to Norwegian law, forced drugging can only be used when, with “high probability, it can lead to recovery or significant improvement in the patient’s condition, or if the patient avoids a significant worsening of the disease.”

Thornford Park provides medium and low secure care to men who are detained under the Mental Health Act 1983. The service specialises in personalised assessment and recovery-based treatment pathways for men with complex care needs, histories of offending and for those who may have failed in previous placements.

Thornford Park Hospital – Elysium Healthcare

http://www.elysiumhealthcare.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/1059-NHSFlyer-Tho…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elysium_Healthcare

BC Partners is an international investment firm with €23 billion of assets under management across private equity, credit and real estate in Europe and North America. The firm invests across all industries. BC Partners was founded in 1986 and has offices in London, New York, Paris, and Hamburg. Since inception, BC Partners has completed 113 private equity investments in companies with a …Founded: 1986; 34 years agoHeadquarters: London (Global), New York CityParisHamburgIndustry: Private equityNumber of employees: ~190

BC Partners – Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BC_PartnersWas this helpful?

BC Partners | Global Leader

https://www.bcpartners.com

BC Partners is an established leader in upper middle market alternative investment, with 30+ years as a leading pan-European buyout investor, and deep networks across Europe and North America.

  • Our TeamBC Partners | Our Team. BC Partners is an established leader in upper middle market …
  • PortfolioBC Partners | Private Equity Investments
  • Private EquitySince inception, BC Partners has maintained a leading position in the buy-out market, …
  • ContactBC Partners | Contact Us. BC Partners is an established leader in upper middle market …
  • About UsBC Partners | Approach. BC Partners is an established leader in upper middle market …
  • Real EstateBC Partners Real Estate (“BCP RE”) is a real estate investment platform launched in …
  • NewsBC Partners (“BC Partners”), a leading private equity firm, today announces the final close …
  • Operating AdvisorsBC Partners | Operating Advisors. BC Partners is an established leader in upper mid

So despite the treatment of Paliperidone by the local Chase Farm Hospital RC there was felt need to send Elizabeth once again to a PICU unit away from home which is completely the wrong environment to recover and that is because there is nothing decent provided locally at Chase Farm Hospital.

From what I can see the owners are BC Partners and that they used to provide PICU care for men but now there is a women’s PICU unit where Elizabeth has been sent called Corridge Ward.

Elizabeth was transported by caged van for an approx 2 hr journey to Thatcham around about rush hr time. It is terrible the way vulnerable people with autism/LD are treated in this country and I believe that an ambulance would have been more humane – they clearly do not have a clue in the UK.

Ambulances, in place of ‘caged police car,’ to carry …

https://www.oregonlive.com/…/2016/05/ambulances_in_place_of_caged_p.html

Ambulances, in place of ‘caged police car,’ to carry people in mental health crisis Updated Jan 09, 2019; Posted May 28, 2016 By Maxine Bernstein | The Oregonian/OregonLive.

The failure once again of Chase Farm Hospital to provide proper assessment has once again resulted in transfer of Elizabeth some distance away. I called into Chase Farm today to speak to Sean about this as I wanted to know who exactly is responsible for providing yet another PICU ward.

Different hospitals, different PICUs, different policies but all the wrong environment and very restrictive just like prison. At least she is allowed her phone in this one.

You have to arrange an appointment in advance and despite Covid there is an external visitors room or Board Room off the ward itself and you have to put possessions in lockers. You have to call at reception first and fill out a form on Covid before entry and wear a mask which is fair enough.

Once in the visitors room you wait until Elizabeth is brought out. I took the opportunity of staying a few days in the area as I have never been there before. I was hoping she would be allowed out but she wasnt as the RC (Responsible Clinician) Dr David Morton was away. I was told he would be back Tuesday but Tuesday was the day I was planning to go home so I extended my stay.

I can ‘t say much about Elysium at the moment apart from the appearance which looks just like prison from the outside.

No leave was granted apart from supervised visit and what was so awful and practically all these hospitals the same was that a member of staff sat there listening to every single word and I requested that the member of staff sat outside as it was so intrusive. They did this at Cygnet Beckton and Cambian and also Cygnet Sevenoaks. Then another member of staff would change over and then another member of staff, all writing notes in their book.

So I managed to visit several times but in this glorious weather patients are not allowed out which is a great pity

What could I do but visit, ask what she wanted and buy it. I went home on the 11th August. I missed the rush hr traffic so the journey back home was not bad.

My criticism is not towards Elysium who on the whole have dealt with me politely/professionally on the phone apart from a slight mix-up when there was contradiction as to whether I could visit on the last day and it was not possible to see any Dr as hoped.

My main criticism goes to my local area of Enfield (Barnet, Enfield and Haringey mental health Trust). From what I can see there are mainly male wards and one mixed and only 1 female.

Today Elizabeth saw a psychologist and I have written to the Consultant Psychiatrist (RC) Dr David Morton. Tribunal is planned shortly.

Where things are failing so badly is at local level. Whilst vast sums of public money spent on these kind of facilities which are wrong, the local area is lacking in facilities and care – Drs denying proper assessment and it is no wonder someone like Elizabeth does not get any better.

Elysium is supposed to be a facility that deal with cases where everything locally has failed – let’s hope they do what Enfield has failed. My only concern is that if discharged back to the local area of Enfield and on their acute ward because Enfield still have not got their act together for community care she could be held for weeks on end on Suffolk Ward and once again deteriorate. The treatment is not working effectively. Elizabeth has neither got correct treatment let alone diagnosis.

Ive no idea how long Elizabeth will be held here for but I am sure such facilities cost a lot of money per week up to £13K.

Since Sectioned on S2 on 5 June this is what Elizabeth has experienced under “care” of BEHMHTNHS.

Failed attempt at placing her on mixed ward at Chase Farm Hospital led to several days of seclusion without phone and family contact.

Then onto St Pancreas Hospital Ruby Ward where, guided by Chase Farm RC, forcibly injected with Paliperidone (Risperidone depot).

After several weeks, transferred back to Suffolk Ward traumatised and placed in seclusion c4 days, injected, then sent onto Cygnet Godden Green, Sevenoaks, where forcibly injected with Paliperidone. Elizabeth, who is terrified of needles, advised that she was so ill she lay in bed not able to move and felt very ill afterwards.

Family visit arranged but suddenly cancelled by Cygnet then allowed week after.

Visited ward, took phone as phone not charging to be repaired

Following 5 weeks at Cygnet Sevenoaks, Elizabeth back on Suffolk Ward. Nothing in place in the community and left on the acute ward Elizabeth reacted to situations resulting in further seclusion of several days and deprival of contact with family as punishment.

Visited ward to take her out for a few hours fresh air as 3 hrs leave allocated- did not know she was back in seclusion. All over weekend beautiful weather but kept in a seclusion room as punishment because of no decent facilities such as a sensory room. No staff would give any information and some refused to give their names.

Suggested taking her tol an outdoor adventure style holiday for a few days – no answer from RC no risk whatsoever as Elizabeth could barely walk day before and could not keep food down and kept crying so a little break in the fresh air might have been good for her. However never got any agreement from the RC and next thing, having turned up at the ward yesterday with some things for Elizabeth, was told she had been sent away again – this time to yet another PICU ward at Elysium, Thatcham, Reading.

This shows that care on offer for mental health patients and autism/LD who are all held together on same ward is totally inadequate and untherapeutic when it comes to dealing with someone so very traumatised.

Another former patient suggested a Sensory Room and I think it is about time more money was spent locally to avoid someone like Elizabeth being sent away time and time again from home.

My other suggestion is care farms – care farms are far more therapeutic than acute wards and Elizabeth likes animals – why is there no facility like this in Enfield or the surrounding area?

When you think how much money is wasted on private/public PICU settings that are wrong environment this is bad. Elizabeth came back even more traumatised and put back on the acute ward that is volatile and noisy it is apalling that there is no other option in Enfield.

Reading back on the files from the very beginning the child-like behaviour of my daughter was apparent dating back to 2008 and absolutely nothing after all this length of time has been done to tackle this apart from give drugs.

The Paliperidone depot is clearly not working as it is not stopping Elizabeth’s reactionary behaviour and in fact she has deteriorated. Why give a drug when it is of no benefit whatsoever and particularly when the RC herself has put a line through it previously to acknowledge she was allergic to it. It is contraindicated and against manufacturer’s instructions to prescribe it when it is contra-indicated.

Today I spoke to someone in the Pals Department and I recognised him from way back when Elizabeth went missing from the Day Hospital with an in patient who was on a criminal charge who should have been escorted everywhere.

So much has happened to my daughter under the care of BEHMHTNHS yet they refused to acknowledge the full report by Dr Bob Johnson of complex PTSD and fail to provide any effective treatment to help her. Having provided private care for four months I know it is possible and she was actually getting better but coming back home to this area of Enfield was the worse thing that could have happened and was not planned either.

The other thing I would point out is that the way you are spoken to by some members of staff is condescending and patronising. I’ll give you some examples of things said to me:

I am a mother I know how you feel

“Are you a professional?” – when it comes to the drugs. “no I am a mother” in other words nothing in their eyes however “I as a mother have turned to experts on the drugs and in research” In other words I can prove what i say.

I do not like the way staff wear name badges back to front and when you ask their names they become defensive.

I do not like the way staff lie when things go wrong or when there is noone who wants to speak to you on the phone.

Elsyium just like Cygnet have been given details of Elizabeth’s sister being NR.

It must have been planned this transfer as when I turned up she had gone.

Once again I am having to travel to visit an area I have never been to before, drive, book accommodation etc. Visiting times are not long and there is always the risk they will refuse at the last minute like they did at Cambian having driven several hours in the car and told to come back the next day.

In desperation I contacted Mencap because Elizabeth is being deprived a proper assessment and not treated fairly under Enfield despite a whole team at Huntercombe said “Aspergers – high spectrum” – this team say low intelligence and emotionally unstable personality disorder and schizophrenia which we totally disagree with. Many other doctors disagree also in the files and this is why a proper assessment needs to be done by a completely independent organisation such as Mencap – it is not independent to get another hospital paid for locally to back them with their diagnosis. An independent assessment should be completely independent.

I previously wrote about my recent declined visit by the RC of Castle Ward that Elizabeth was too ill to see anyone the day after I spoke to her when she was clearly looking forward to my visit and asked me to bring her things.

I am pleased to inform everyone that Cygnet did eventually facilitate my visit. I drove to Sevenoaks and decided to stay over just in case there was sudden change in plan.

Only I was allowed in to see her as I was lucky and so fortunate to have some witnesses on hand.

I was taken to the visitor’s room and at first surrounded by staff and had to wear a face mask though not all staff wore facemasks and I was told I must wear it at all times.

I saw a psychiatrist and Responsible Clinician as there is always more than one involved but the overall responsibility for care lies solely with the Responsible Clinician who is in charge of everything.

Elizabeth was not allowed out and it was a lovely sunny day but when I explained I was staying a bit longer the RC granted three hours leave which was nice.

The visit to Elizabeth was not unpleasant. Staff were nice to me. I had come to check out Elizabeth’s phone as none of us could contact her and it turned out it was broken but Cygnet to be fair took liability and I took her out to the town buying her lunch and trying to get some more clothes as the clothes she was wearing were too small. She had ballooned in weight.

I wanted to take Elizabeth to see the deer in beautiful grounds nearby but just the lunch and trip into town took too much time and I thought I would then go on to visit the beautiful house and grounds of nearby Chartwell Winston Churchill’s former family home.

Chartwell – Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chartwell

I wanted to take Elizabeth back there the following week thinking she would be at Cygnet for up to 3 months.

With three hours leave a day I was happy as I had not seen Elizabeth for weeks on end. Also trouble getting through on the phone was upsetting but now I was there and able to sort out the phone which had been broken I felt happier.

There is so much to see and do in the surrounding beautiful area of Sevenoaks I now had something to look forward to and proposed to visit the following week with Elizabeth’s sister.

Meeting the team was good as communicating over the phone is not always the best thing but there was one person who stood out, that being Tom Higa who communicated well with me and took on board my comments and actually listened to what I had to say which is very rare.

The visit the following week did not take place because Elizabeth was brought back to Suffolk Ward once again very late at night. It is from Suffolk ward that Elizabeth has been transferred all over the place, most recently to St Pancreas Hospital Ruby Ward, Camden and then Cygnet Sevenoaks and Elizabeth being autistic but deprived of a formal assessment to have such changes in a short space of time is most traumatic for her.

I had hoped that Cygnet would do a proper assessment on Aspergers and take a look at her complex PTSD, already diagnosed in an expert witness report but dismissed by all at BEHMHTNHS except for their clinical psychologist Kajori Mukherjee. I doubt an assessment was carried out.

Back on Suffolk Ward I thought at least she would be nearer home but felt very uneasy because of past treatment my daughter has received on this ward under the Responsible Clinician still in charge and it seemed like instead of tackling her trauma they used punishment on the wards ie lengthy seclusions of nearly a week, following which transfer onto PICU settings, identified as being entirely unsuitable by the RC’s of the respective wards where she had been sent because when you look at environment, how can this be good for a trauma victim when noisy and volatile. Elizabeth was on 15 minutes watch and 1-1 which was very restrictive at Cygnet. Now back on Suffolk Ward she is held in seclusion.

The RC is still the same one who goes back years and who sticks firmly with her belief of “paranoid schizophrenia” and “emotional unstable personality disorder” – the latter I see as most stimatizing and unscientific, considering the extent of all the terrible abuse Elizabeth has suffered whilst under care in the community etc. Most accurately, yet dismissed, Elizabeth has a full report from Dr Bob Johnson, a very experienced Psychiatrist, who states she has “complex PTSD going back to 2010” to which we as a family all agree. This report has been ignored locally together with his recommendation of “intensive trauma therapy” which is why Elizabeth has deteriorated and not got better. No therapy of such description has ever been given to Elizabeth. As for Schizophrenia this is an unscientific umbrella diagnosis for other causes and in Elizabeth’s case the causes are physical as I have proven but thanks to advice from the wonderful Psychiatrist Dr Joanna Moncrieff, as I follow advice from doctors and Professors who are truthful and honest I took my daughter to see an Endocrinologist which proved my point. Another point to note is that I am not stating I know better than Doctors who come across as arrogant in many cases and treat you like you do not exist and there have been many abusive comments stated in the files behind my back so I am not trying to say I know better than these doctors but would comment that I have gone to the very top – to Professors and pharmacologists for advice on the medication to find out the true facts based on research. There are many doctors who take an easy and cheap option of drugging and of continuing to stick with a diagnosis they see fit, ignoring so many other doctor’s professional opinions for which I have reports and the treatment of prescribing therefore does not work when underlying physical health conditions are ignored for instance. Then when you read about the tragic case of Oliver McGowan it is dreadful to think that no lessons have been learned resulting in further deaths as I see Elizabeth’s case has similarities and see that her life is currently being put at risk because of the Palilperidone Depot Injections being prescribed on Suffolk Ward Chase Farm Hospital Enfield.

Right now, my daughter is being held in seclusion on this beautiful sunny day as a punishment by Doctors and the Doctor in charge goes way back to 2014 Ct of Protection case where professionals from her team allowed infiltration by the COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH TEAM PARK AVENUE so that could report nastily for court purposes behind my back but thanks to the COURT OF PROTECTION they saw through this despite me not having any representation in court. I will be forever grateful to this Court who treated us fairly as otherwise Elizabeth would have been forced back to Phoenix House Stepping Stones Northampton where she had no food at the weekend. Previously the current RC did not answer my request for leave for a holiday and money was wasted as I was told otherwise. The holiday was with Working to Recovery Summer Camp that would have benefitted Elizabeth. It is definitely punishment not care and this today has been confirmed in no uncertain terms in my conversation just now with a nurse called Ada. The conversation is typical of the way many professionals respond defensively and came across as patronising.

I phoned to find out if Elizabeth was still held in seclusion and it was kind of like -you know the answer to that rather than a straight yes or no. So on this wonderful sunny day my daughter is being punished by Doctors and others who are knowingly given depot injections of Paliperidone she is allergic to. Instead of acknowledging this fact Ada commented on “bad behaviour” by Elizabeth. These accusations are commonplace and biased as bad behaviour is only ever mentioned in terms of the patient or their families – never themselves. So if you misbehave or in other words suddenly become distressed and act out your emotions of fear, you are thrown into a seclusion ward at Chase Farm Hospital Suffolk Ward and kept there for days on end before being transfer an expensive PICU ward far away from home, instead of someone trying to communicate kindly with the traumatised patient IT IS PUNISHMENT NOT CARE and the professionals justify this by stating “if your daughter behaved herself ………” or words to that effect. I could hardly get a word in – I wanted to know if she was still locked away like a prisoner for the third time, deprived of contact with family, phone taken away so that Police cannot be called for instance. This is why they do it. It is worse than prison for someone so badly abused like my daughter under the “care” of BARNET ENFIELD AND HARINGEY MENTAL HEALTH TRUST who have yet to respond to my complaint and who have tried to label me as Vexatious Complainant to which I responded with everyone’s comments showing how everyone has tried to cover up substantial failings and let one person in particular take the blame ie the Director of MH when in actual fact my complaint was addressed to absolutely everyone. I feel like featuring that, their responses and all the safeguarding minutes as an example of how professionals all stick together and bully you when things go wrong and no-one raises their hands to take any kind of responsibility because they are all too busy protecting their jobs/salaries and in a doctors case their licence is more important. That says it all doesn’t it. It is not about care but protecting themselves and their own backs.

Yesterday I requested a copy of the Code of Conduct for Seclusion ie I was curious to know how long it is acceptable to keep someone locked away ie punished for their so called behaviour for which I’m still waiting to hear. Could not even get through to Pals so I phoned Tracy, PA of CEO Jinjer Kandola who then said she would contact Pals herself.

So in Barnet Enfield and Haringey MH Trust it would appear to be “Policy” that there is no length of time for seclusions or is there simply no policy or code of conduct. The first time in seclusion was several days before transfer to St Pancreas Hospital as they tried against my advice to put my terrified daughter on a mixed ward. After that seclusion again whilst I get a text message asking me to call the Police on behalf of her and other patients who had barricaded themselves in a room. That led to an injection of course and more punishment of seclusion for about 4 or 5 days – the excuse as always is that someone’s behaviour is bad and that it is justifiable to punish in this way depriving phone contact which affects all the family before transfer to another PICU costing circa £13000 pw and the Doctors there just like Huntercombe state wrong environment. So who is responsible for providing such care and the beds that go with it? Why isn’t decent care/facilities provided in Enfield? Why are the voluntary organisations deprived of cash to help people in the local area of Enfield when there is money to burn by sending someone like my daughter far away from home and family? Again it comes back to why isn’t there better facilities in the local area and perhaps Jinjer Kandola CEO can explain to everyone why???

So whilst on the phone to Ada I asked for the name of the Ward Manager – His is name is Gyada Antwi – I think I’ve met him yesterday as I became entrapped in the double doors asking to speak to the ward manager because I wanted a copy of their Code of Conduct and in particular on seclusion. I was then confronted by three men, I think he was amongst them telling me to leave the premises then barely audible, the threat of “IF YOU DONT LEAVE I’LL CALL SECURITY” – what kind of communication is that! All I wanted was the Code of Conduct – if there is any such thing under Barnet Enfield and Haringey MH Trust and I felt both intimidated and threatened – once again faced with zero communication skills – if this is I was communicated with then this is how the patients are treated – like a piece of rubbish.

Ada was telling me that another Doctor – Dr Varsha was due to see Elizabeth today. I really don’t need any explanation and excuses for decisions made when there is only ONE RESPONSIBLE CLINICIAN IN CHARGE who I have clashed with in asking for extended leave so I can take Elizabeth on a short break – the excuse was “what about the risks” – Absolutely no risks now they have drugged her up like a zombie to the point she has to hold onto my arm, she could not keep food down, she kept crying all the time. I AM SO BITTER TOWARDS BARNET ENFIELD AND HARINGEY MENTAL HEALTH TRUST WHO HAVE DESTROYED MY DAUGHTER’S LIFE AND MINE. There might be some kind people working within the Trust however the majority stick together like glue from what I can see defending one another including a Responsible Clinician they go along with for sake of their jobs but they all know from the notes that they could be killing my daughter which is why I want this all made public and transparent as I see similarities here to the case of Oliver McGowan ie Doctors who care more about their Licence than whether a patient has a bad reaction they put down to bad behaviour they can punish – they look at that person and patronisingly point the finger accusing that person of bad behaviour knowing full well they are causing that person to behave that way by THEIR TREATMENT and choosing to ignore other Doctor’s professional diagnoses but even drugs charts they themselves put a line through re allergy.

I always look further and question why someone might behave differently or show aggression or lash out in fear. This person needs to be in the right environment and not any NHS ACUTE MENTAL HEALTH OR PRIVATE SECTOR PICU WARD. When you look at the remarkable campaign on Twitter by Jeremy, Bethany’s Dad (she was fed through a hatch) unfortunately many others are treated in the most apalling manner and completely misunderstood by so called professionals who stick together and defend one another and will never admit blame – this is why it is so important to be transparent open and honest.

It is like calling someone a liar when a professional spins lies by trying to convince the patient that they have a certain diagnosis that this professional believes in and overrules other professional opinions. What needs to be done is in such instances in cases where there is massive dispute like in Elizabeth’s case are for external assessments to be undertaken and the one thing I would praise Huntercombe for is that they differed from the opinion of the local area.

If a diagnosis is wrong then so is the treatment and the vulnerable person suffers by punishment after punishment after punishment and becomes a revolving door case.

It is absolutely heartbreaking to hear my daughter talk since coming home and ending up the dreadful local area and now I fear for her life because of their treatment. I’m too upset to type her comments but when I sent her to stay with kind humane professionals in 2016 for the first time she came back well and even wanted a job.

It is also upsetting to read all the lies – it is stated “clozapine was helpful” when it caused injury and tachycardia and Mews Score 3.

It is upsetting to read that she was “forced” to go and stay on the Isle of Lewis with the wonderful professionals Working to Recovery- these comments remain in the care plan along with the most disturbing comments of “alleged sexual abuse to a child” WHERE IS THE EXPLANATION TO THIS I AM FED UP WITH WAITING BEHMHTNHS. IVE DONE A PUBLIC DECLARATION REQUEST AND I WANT TO HEAR YOUR RESPONSE RIGHT HERE ON TWITTER AFTER ALL THE ABUSE MY DAUGHTER HAS RECEIVED. So many harmful lies to discredit both vulnerable person and their families and I am only too happy to reveal this dishonesty and pack of lies right here for everyone to see as I am not alone.

I highlight below the very sad case of Oliver McGowan. RIP Oliver. It makes me sad as no lessons will ever be learned unless Doctors are made more accountable.

My daughter Elizabeth is currently being forcibly drugged under Barnet Enfield and Haringey MH Trust Suffolk Ward right now on drugs previously found to be allergic to/contraindicated to her underlying physical health conditions – pinned down by up to six members of staff and injected with poisonous chemicals they know full well previously found to be allergic to.

I am hoping that Oliver’s family will at long last get the justice they deserve with a criminal investigation underway. I have decided to notify Police of my concerns right now and would urge other parents to do likewise. When a Doctor ignores everything (even putting a line through the drugs chart acknowledging previous allergy) in other cases where physical health conditions are ignored then these doctors should be made accountable after all, Drs should do no harm. Other members of staff who knowingly administer medication when drawn to attention the facts of contraindications and allergy where diagnosis is in enormous doubt should likewise be held accountable when things go wrong. It is not a matter of “please take your medication as my licence is at stake“. When Drs knowingly prescribe such enormous quantities of drugs above BNF level then there needs to be accountability as they put lives at risk. More people should be challenging this important issue.

In Elizabeth’s case she was found to be a poor/non metaboliser through the unique p450 liver enzyme tests I had done. I have to say some Doctors have respected this but NOT UNDER BEHMHTNHS. There are some areas like Enfield where anything goes and physical health conditions needing referral to Endocrinology, Neurology is ignored in favour of a MH label which some Doctors choose to stick by, ignoring and disregarding other doctor’s professional opinions. This is how death and injury can occur.

I highlight the shocking sad case of Oliver McGowan as an example of this below:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-53255043

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/oliver-mcgowan-death-autistic-anti-psychotic-medication-nhs-training-a9184686.html

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/police-investigate-death-oliver-mcgowan-4281745

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/southmead-hospital-doctor-who-gave-1473915

https://www.england.nhs.uk/2019/08/nhs-announces-top-clinician-and-independent-expert-to-oversee-review-death-of-oliver-mcgowan/

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/family-oliver-mcgowan-cover-up-2338438

I cannot wait until the mandatory training is in place https://www.skillsforcare.org.uk/Documents/Topics/Learning-disability/Mandatory-training/ITT-open-Feb-2020.pdf

As a parent, I have become accustomed to being bullied, ignored, deprived of contact, excluded and ridiculed and the most nasty defamatory comments are written behind your back when the team in desperation stick together to try and cover things up when on numerous occasions things have gone wrong under care. A patient is humiliated, gaslighted and coerced and in the end the truth is revealed. This is care under the NHS and I am featuring my local area of Enfield. It is enough to put you off seeing a Dr for life when you look at the overprescribing done under Enfield MH in the past causing Akathisia. Care under the NHS in my local area has no boundaries in terms of spending and under the MH the CCGs waste enormous public funds by not providing the right kind of care leaving a patient more traumatised than ever before. How many times has she been sent to a PICU ward because the care/environment on Suffolk Ward is totally inadequate and there is no support in the community because so much money is wasted by the community MH team on legal action trying to get rid of the nearest relative. Under a PICU she was held most recently on Cygnet Godden Green Sevenoaks – this along with St Pancreas Hospital, Ruby Ward Camden, Huntercombe Roehampton had been used simply for rapid tranquilisation, not care by Barnet Enfield and Haringey MH Trust but at least Huntercombe diagnosed her as having High Spectrum Aspergers which the current RC chose to ignore.

Today I received phone calls from my daughter looking forward to seeing me and coming off the ward as the only way patients can come off the ward now is being escorted by staff but this was not allowed today. Firstly I was told by Elizabeth there was an exercise class on the ward but apparently noone came and knocked on her door to remind her of the time so she did not attend – that is if the class even took place. Then there was some kind of buffet meal provided by the GMC apparently which Elizabeth would have found quite overwhelming being autistic, especially if there were lots of patients in the same room. So I turned up at Chase Farm Hospital and this was the first I heard she was once again placed in seclusion. I am sick and tired of Barnet Enfield and Haringey Doctors putting blame on a patient’s behaviour when they are knowingly and unaccountably drugging that patient on medication previously found to be allergic to and contraindicated to their physical health. It is never ever blame on their part. It is always blame on the patient and their family but let’s face it, Elizabeth instead of getting better under their care has got worse and worse and sent from pillar to post all the way to Wales (Cambian), Bethlem where she had a mews score 3 critical and was prescribed 2 x bnf levels of drugs plus developed tachycardia. She was sent to Huntercombe Roehampton, to a care home in Northampton where she had no food at the weekend, then to St Pancreas Ward and most recently Cygnet Godden Green, the third of Cygnet placements. This Trust (Barnet Enfield & Haringey MH Trust) clearly has money to burn and yet provides nothing decent in the community.

I have just written to the Rt Hon Feryl Clark MP for her help in this matter as we as a family were having difficulty in getting through on the phone to my daughter who was recently sent a long distance away. This is her response:

“Dear Susan, 

We are writing in response to the voicemail message you left asking for an update on your case. 

We note you refer to the complaint you have raise against health services and understand, from our correspondence with Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust (BEH MHT) that your complaint is still being investigated. Please be advised that we have not raised a separate complaint. 

With regards to the enquiries we have raised, we received a response from Enfield Council but are yet to receive a response form BEH MHT. We will contact you once we have received both responses as this will enable us to provide you with an update which encompasses the wider picture. 

In the enquiries we have raised, have asked the relevant bodies for reassurance that they are aware of Elizabeth’s situation and are working to provide her with both the social and medical care and support she urgently requires. So where is such care under this brutal area – it is punishment not care when the treatment and facilities for care are totally wrong and inadequate. It is an area where they have money to burn on private sector PICUs instead of improving the quality of care on the acute MH wards where a patient’s physical health is overlooked because a doctor who is in charges chooses to ignore and overlook and carry on prescribing drugs previously found to be allergic to.

As we have advised you previously, sadly we are not in a position to comment on medical diagnoses therefore we are sorry that we are unable to assist you with this aspect of your concerns and wish you the best in your pursuit.  Then you need to address this important issue in Parliament because young vulnerable people like my daughter are dying as a result of care and treatment provided under MH where certain Doctors choose to totally ignore a patient’s physical health and wellbeing knowing full well that a drug found to be previously allergic to is prescribed and parent’s advice are ignored. I am not even a Dr to state that what is going on is wrong and I WANT THIS MATTER ADDRESSED IN PARLIAMENT BECAUSE IT AFFECTS LOTS OF OTHER PEOPLE.

To date, we have received a high volume of information from you and appreciate you sharing your concerns with us however, we would greatly appreciate if you could, in a clear and concise email, set out exactly what you would like us to do to assist Elizabeth whilst considering the representations we have made thus far and our stance on some of your concerns. We hope you will understand and agree that due to the complex nature of this case, we require this email as a steer moving forward.   I want everything addressed in Parliament as here is a good example of the most abusive care in the UK – drugging a patient – with drugs prev allergic to and contraindicated putting their life at risk and blaming their behaviour on wrongly treatment. and neglect when the diagnosis is completely and utterly wrong and other Doctors say so not me. The amount of money wasted by providing the wrong kind of care in PICUS far and wide should be made accountable to the general public as it is after all public money when I spent a fraction of this money on decent humane care only to left without a scrap of support in Enfield on my daughter’s return. The other area is tribunals and bullying the Nearest Relatives when paperwork is drawn up unlawfully time and time again by unaccountable professionals who go out of their way to avoid blame and try to put blame on the parents/families and patients instead of apologising.

THERE IS NOTHING COMPLEX IN THIS CASE. IT IS A CASE THAT SHOULD BE LOOKED UPON AS TOPICAL RIGHT NOW AND THAT LESSONS NEED TO BE LEARNED WHEN VULNERABLE PATIENTS DIE AS A RESULT OF DRs PRESCRIBING DRUGS KNOWN TO BE CONTRA INDICATED AND ALLERGY RELATED AND THERE NEEDS TO BE ACCOUNTABILITY AND THIS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED IN PARLIAMENT AND ALSO THE MANDATORY TRAINING MENTIONED IN THE LINK ABOVE IS PUT IN PLACE.

MY DAUGHTER WANTS AN AUTISM/ASPERGERS ASSESSMENT AND THE CURRENT RC IS IN DISPUTE WITH MANY OTHER DOCTORS AND THEREFORE NOT PROVIDING THE RIGHT KIND OF CARE AND TREATMENT AND SENDING ELIZABETH ALL OVER THE PLACE WHICH IS MORE TRAUMATIC FOR SOMEONE WHO HAS A DIAGNOSIS BY SO MANY OF COMPLEX PTSD AND ASPERGERS/ DEVELOPMENTAL DIAGNOSIS.

The sad case of Oliver McGowan should be noted and lessons learned but that is not being done in Enfield under Chase Farm Hospital. My daughter is once again in seclusion on Suffolk Ward. She was not allowed out with me today. A proposed short break has not been agreed by the current RC. Elizabeth who I saw yesterday could not stop crying. Elizabeth could not swallow her food without being ill. Elizabeth was walking like she did when they forced Clozapine on her and now on Suffolk Ward once again yet more brutal treatment is being dished out and you as an MP should address this treatment. I want everything made public on Twitter as this is affecting many people in other areas too and I want everyone to learn from ENFIELD BARNET AND HARINGEY MH TRUST and the COMMUNITY TEAM I have featured in my story “Get Her Back We Are Paying for that”.

I note that you feature comments supporting George Floyd well I too support those comments but I wish to further draw to your attention the fact that vulnerable people of all ethnic backgrounds who suffer from MH and LD/autism are being dreadfully abused by their treatment much of which goes on under the NHS acute MH wards themselves and then someone within the Trust spends £13000 pw on private ATUs – this is enormous money to spend on a totally wrong environment and I would like an explanation as to why this money is not being spent on care in the community to prevent people like my daughter being incarcerated in such dreadful places as acute wards where behind closed doors terrible treatment goes on. I would also appreciate your assistance for my daughter to be properly and independently assessed because there is huge conflict on the diagnosis the hospital RC sticks to against so many other Doctors opinions.

We look forward to your response.  AND I LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR RESPONSE RIGHT HERE ON TWITTER SO THAT I CAN FEATURE THIS IN MY NEXT BLOG. IF NOT THEN I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A MEETING WITH THE RT HON FERYAL CLARK

Yours sincerely, 
On behalf of the Office of Feryal Clark
Member of Parliament for Enfield North 

Westminster Office
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA

Tel: 0207 219 6607

Website: https://www.feryalclark.co.uk/

Last of all I asked for a copy of the Code of Practice when it came to length of seclusions under Barnet Enfield and Haringey MH Trust – I am most interested to hear how long a vulnerable patient is held and abused in this way as Elizabeth was held for than just a few days and deprived of fresh air and exercise.

—— Original Message ———- From: Nnennaya Aitalegbe DEPUTY WARD MANAGER<NnennayaAitalegbe@cygnethealth.co.uk>
To: Susan Bevis <
Date: 04 July 2020 at 14:26
Subject: RE: Visit – Tuesday 7 June 2020

Good evening Mrs Bevis

Thank you for your email.

Following our conversation, I have spoken with the responsible clinician she has confirmed that attending ward round at this present moment will not be ideal  as LB is currently very unwell. ******** currently reports that everything seems too much for her and she is worried about your  proposed visit. She is being supported on the ward and encouraged to remain focused.

Best wishes

Nena

I spoke to my daughter yesterday who sounded a bit happier on the phone yesterday. Not once has she phoned on HER phone. She told me she had made a couple of friends but they were all starving and could I bring some food with me so she could share with her friends. I asked if she wanted me to visit and she said “yes” – I asked her more than once and I mentioned that I had requested to come to the ward round and asked whether Nnenna had spoken to her about it and she said “no”. The letter above is in stark contrast to what I was told. Nnennaya Aitalegbe is the Deputy Ward Manager of Cygnet Godden Green Sevenoaks who is saying that Elizabeth does not want me to visit and THAT IS NOT TRUE AND I HAVE WITNESSES.

I told Nena that I would be coming anyway as I had promised to as I had agreed to bring her food. Never before has a Cygnet Hospital treated me this way or my daughter and this needs looking at. There seems to be different rules here at Cygnet Godden Green, Sevenoaks to other Cygnet hospitals. I am most concerned by the way Nnennaya is trying to deprive access to seeing my daughter just like Cambian did with RC Allyson Witts stating she was not well enough to come for Xmas yet she was brought down flanked by two nurses who were ordered to stay all the time with her.

I telephoned Cygnet Godden Green yesterday and spoke to Deputy Ward Manager Nnenna Yaaitalegbe and I am waiting to hear as to whether my visit will be agreed next Tuesday for ward round. She said she would have to ask Elizabeth and arrange with Dr Ruvini Senesinghe, the RC (Responsible Clinician). As yet I have not heard anything.

Elizabeth has been at Cygnet Godden Green 2 weeks now. Dr Ruvini Senesinghe said it would be Ok to visit and to contact the Ward Manager to facilitate. Normally Cygnet would have a visitor’s room so I enquired whether this could be booked as it is a long way to travel. When I asked whether an advocate could be present Nnennay commented that Elizabeth already had an advocate but I explained that the advocate was for me as Elizabeth’s sister could not come as planned. I am waiting to hear back from Nnenna. Mencap know of Elizabeth’s situation and were very helpful. They put me in touch with an organisation called access charity.

Access Charity

https://www.accesscharity.org.uk

The above organisation deals with:

Access to justice and enforcing the right to social care. We have set up a Legal Network to ensure that people get the social care that they have a right to so that they can live fulfilled lives in the community.

It has been social care that has failed. “there is no structure in the community” said Elizabeth, her days filled aimlessly with going out shopping alone, nothing to do, no mentor, no support worker, which I know in some areas is provided. Elizabeth has never had help in the community despite living alone in a flat so I had to help her clean the flat, cook healthy meals and not been able to shield as the Government recommended.

Yesterday was distressing hearing Elizabeth say she felt like she was going to die after the forced Paliperidone injection. She described 6 members of staff pinning her up against a wall and said for the next two days she felt so ill that she couldn’t move from her bed.

This injection should be given once a month only at the now lowered dosage of 100mg from 150mg previously prescribed by Suffolk Ward. However I am concerned that this has been given more frequently by Castle Ward as it sounds as though from what Elizabeth has told me this been given twice already and she has only been there 2 weeks. This is why I would like to go to the Ward Round. I have heard from leading experts that the administering of this particular drug is extremely specialised requiring a great deal of caution. I was led to believe the dosage had been lowered but from what Elizabeth told me it sounds like the injection is being given more frequently in which case it is in fact being increased.

I am in touch with those who have expert knowledge on drugs and I have welcomed opportunity for Elizabeth to be included most recently in the research by Professor Philip McGuire on CBD. However I was told by Dr Ruvini Senesinghe this would not be possible as not recommended by NICE. The only option was to put her back on a drug previously found to be allergic to because NICE have not examined the success of Professor Philip McGuire’s research. On section 3 there is nothing you can do to challenge treatment – of great concern is NICE do not seem to take enough into account harm done by their recommendation of such drugs known to cause harm, going through lawsuits in the US, some here in the UK. Doctors ignore their NICE guidelines and ignore manufacturer’s instructions/contraindications.

I was initially excluded from Elizabeth’s recent tribunal by video link from St Pancreas Hospital Ruby Ward on the grounds I disagreed with treatment. The team tried to use the usual excuse that Elizabeth did not consent. However Elizabeth had in fact given consent and I then had to be included at short notice. At the Tribunal I was asked was “are you a professional who has knowledge of the drug treatment” to which I replied “no” I am a mother but have sought expert opinion backed by research from more than one expert on the drugs in order to conclude Elizabeth’s treatment was wrong. It is not as though I as a mother know better than the doctors but had sought scientific research and gained knowledge from this via experts. Drug treatment is an area CQC should be concentrating on most of all (yet say their inspectors have no knowledge on drugs) as wrong prescribing can cause injury and death and here is an example of such:

PRESCRIBING AT CYGNET

Below medication prescribed by a different branch of Cygnet to just 1 patient.

Regular Medication: Sertraline 200mg mane; Depakote 750mg BD; Mebeverine MR 200MG BD; Metformine 1G bd; Atorvastatin 40mg OD; Omeprazole 20mg mane;  Furosemide 50mg mane; Dapaglifozin 10mg mane; Diazepam 5mg TDS; Colecalciferol T OM; Kwells 300mg TDS; Clozapine 225mg BD .

PRM Medication: Ibrufen 200-400mg up to QDs; Epipen 0.3mg up to 0.9mg; Cyclizine tab 50mg up to 150mg;  Procyclidine 5mg PO max in 24 hrs 10 mg; Olanzapine 2.5-5mg max 200mg (PRN + regular); Promethazine 25-50mg max dose 100mg in 24 hrs;  Salbutamol 100mcg; Glucogel/Glucsgon T; Corsodyl ; Lactulose;  Stat dose of Clopizol Acuphase given on 3 occasions since admission – forcibly injected.

Surely on this level of drugs someone could suffer enormous injury and this could lead to death?

CQC I do not agree! If I as a mother can take time and trouble to contact pharmacologists/experts on the drugs then so can the CQC and that is exactly what I would do if I was an inspector with the CQC – if there was anything I did not know then I would find out about it by experts.

It is apalling Tribunals and courts take the same attituded “we are not experts on prescribing”, trust the doctors and brush aside scientific evidence backing prescribing at huge levels as above. The MHA criteria is “risk to self and others” – this should take into account the risks to the patient from faulty prescribing. I as a mother have accumulated vast scientific evidence on prescribing and if it was up to me I would have patients tested to see if they could metabolise the drugs first as Elizabeth has had the P450 liver enzyme test done which stated “poor/non metaboliser”, I had to appoint a private GP to analyse the test results carried out by world’s leading experts Erasmus in Rotterdam. This is disgraceful as the tests should be available to everyone on the NHS in all GP surgeries because in the long term, these tests could save money by less prescribing, resulting in less injury inflicted upon patients who suffer adverse reactions which are not symptoms of so called “illness”.

” It is utterly appalling that her life is being taken away and that at only 33 she has lost all the aspirations she should have enjoyed.

Yes, very true, Elizabeth once wanted to be a chef. She went to college, had a job, was learning to drive and wanted to travel. Her life and mine have been ruined by the NHS. She once looked like a model but is now a size 20. Doctors under NHS have worsened her condition by reckless concomitant prescribing at max levels experimenting whilst ignoring underlying physical health concerns. They all back one another and involve other doctors to support them when they do not want it to look like they are directly involved. So they send someone away from the local area and pay huge sums of public money in order to get backing. Elizabeth has been sent all over the country far and wide “we are guided by the local Trust” said the RC of Ruby Ward St Pancreas – they are instructed, and stick together on opinion.

 To: susanb25
Date: 22 May 2020 at 13:03
Subject: Re: Xeplion (Palperidone)

Potassium levels below 3,0 mmol/l cause significant Q-T interval prolongation with subsequent risk of torsade des pointes, ventricular fibrillation and sudden cardiac death

YES, ELIZABETH’S POTASSIUM LEVELS ARE LOW AND I HAVE EXTENSIVE TESTS DONE TO PROVE THIS.


To: susanb25
Date: 22 May 2020 at 12:47
Subject: Re: Xeplion (Palperidone)

Who should not take Paliperidone Palmitate Syringe?

The following conditions are contraindicated with this drug. Check with your physician if you have any of the following:

Conditions:


  • Who should not take Paliperidone Palmitate Syringe? The following conditions are contraindicated with this drug. Check with your physician if you have any of the following:Conditions:
    • breast cancer
    • diabetes
    • a high prolactin level
    • excessive fat in the blood
    • low amount of magnesium in the blood
    • dehydration
    • low amount of potassium in the blood
    • overweight
    • very low levels of granulocytes
    • a type of white blood cell
    • low levels of white blood cells
    • low levels of a type of white blood cell called neutrophils
    • confusion
    • suicidal thoughts
    • a type of movement disorder called parkinsonism
    • tardive dyskinesia
    • a disorder characterized by involuntary movements of the face
    • mouth and tongue
    • neuroleptic malignant syndrome
    • a reaction characterized by fever
    • muscle rigidity and confusion
    • a low seizure threshold
    • a heart attack
    • angina
    • a type of chest pain
    • torsades de pointes
    • a type of abnormal heart rhythm
    • chronic heart failure
    • abnormal EKG with QT changes from birth
    • a disorder of the blood vessels of the brain
    • orthostatic hypotension
    • a form of low blood pressure
    • compression of the esophagus
    • priapism
    • a prolonged erection of the penis
    • seizures
    • weight gain
    • susceptible to breathing fluid into lungs
    • pregnancy
    • decreased blood volume
    • problems with food passing through the esophagus
    • metabolic syndrome x
    • dementia in an elderly person
    • diffuse Lewy body disease
    • cataract surgery
    • floppy iris during eye surgery
    • abnormal muscle movements
    • chronic kidney disease stage 2 (mild)
    • chronic kidney disease stage 3A (moderate)
    • chronic kidney disease stage 3B (moderate)
    • chronic kidney disease stage 4 (severe)Allergies:
    • Risperidone Analogues


      https://www.netdoctor.co.uk/medicines/brain-nervous-system/a8793/xeplion-paliperidone/
    • “As for lesions in white matter there is evidence of this causing psychosis but this is normally in older adults or those that have suffered cerebral infarctions.  The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Neuroscience does advise clinicians to scan for frontal lobe lesions in patients presenting with psychosis and the endocrinology journals advise examination of the thyroid and parathyroid, since lesions in the parathyroid can also cause psychotic symptoms.  Late onset psychosis is often associated with this type of injury.

Elizabeth had a cyst – how can this suddenly disappear? Also I appointed a private Endocrinologist who did extensive tests which revealed underlying physical health conditions that should have been monitored but HAVE NOT BEEN under the NHS – conditions such as thyroid/PCOS – she is also insulin resistant and this is why I cannot agree with the diagnosis. I know there is something that is physically wrong and I am not even a Doctor. Doctors stated throughout the files “lets rule out anything organic” – so what is happening in my opinion is that Doctors look for a quick and cheap solution and when a patient such as Elizabeth complains they do not feel well then this is simply ignored – they just carry on prescribing knowing full well that what they are doing is harming someone’s physical health and wellbeing and a Doctor should do NO HARM.

As for the ‘diagnosis’. The definition psychosis is not in itself a medical diagnosis but refers to presentation of behaviour the patient.  This can be delusions, hallucinations and agitated or violent outbursts unconnected with immediate environment.

 If Elizabeth presents with any of this kind of behaviour it will be described as psychosis.  It is for the purposes of immediate medical intervention irrelevant what the underlying cause might be.  The first intervention has to be directed at attenuating the behaviour and then it is possible to look for potential causes.

There is bias re the first paragraph above as the team who made home visits prior to the CoP case tried to make out home environment was wrong by nasty reporting – in actual fact it has been questioned at one tribunal as to why Elizabeth remained problem free whilst at home. Whilst I reduced the Clozapine that gave her heart problems and NMS she revealed the full truth about the abuse she had suffered under care which showed the diagnosis to be completely wrong. I only sought private help at enormous cost in Kent when Elizabeth developed a nasty cough – this was an anticholinergic reaction so I was told. My search for private help revealed there was no facility in the UK who could help someone who had suffered injured and come off prescribed drugs which was so wrong as I had proved Elizabeth’s condition to be trauma and not schizophrenia – in fact she spoke clearly and said “eleven years of my life ruined – eleven years on these drugs” . Facilities need to be provided in the UK to help with drug withdrawals and assessments particularly when the diagnosis has been proven to be wrong as in Elizabeth’s case.

  • As I have explained before section 3 MHA1983 is a legal mechanism for treating patients without their consent, informed or otherwise.  There is no necessity to obtain a patient’s consent on section 3, the criteria for treating without consent are simply to save life, to prevent a serious deterioration, to alleviate serious suffering and to prevent the patient from behaving violently or being a danger to self or others (as long as the treatment represents the minimum interference necessary).

The above wrong. Why are people under the MH treated like second-hand citizens? This is not saving life – lives are being ruined. Who can honestly say no harm is being done when you look at what doctors are prescribing as per example above that can lead to death. To alleviate serious suffering is wrong too – this has increased suffering to Elizabeth and I have proven that with the right care in the right environment Elizabeth could get well at a fraction of the cost. I would rather Elizabeth be sent far away to get the right treatment in the right environment which is not a PICU/acute ward. Also it is not recommended hypnotherapy under NICE Guidelines but when I sent Elizabeth to Susan Hepburn of Harley Street this worked brilliantly. I now know why the team tried everything to persuade Elizabeth not to go and that was because this could have revealed everything she suffered under a certain scheme in the community whereas my intention was to speed up the process of provision under the Person Centred Approach which had been going on 6 months and provided nothing for her to do in the community as her days consisted of aimless shopping – chores expected to be undertaken in her home – a studio flat within a MH scheme. On 800mg Quetiapine “how can anyone function on this level of drugs in the community?” This led to Akathisia and on Clozapine, Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome. In other words more harm than good.


To:susanb25
Date: 12 June 2020 at 20:47

The informed consent legislation does not apply to psychiatric medications administered under s3 MHA 1983.  It only refers to non-related physical treatments so even Metformin can be given on the grounds it is related to the psychosis. ”

Well this needs to be changed! a

Xv Finland 34806/04 [2012] ECHR 1371, [2012] MHLO 128 …

www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk › X_v_Finland_34806 › 04_(2012)_ECHR_1371,_(20…

Mental Health and Mental Capacity Law Blog, ‘X v Finland – Are we in trouble?’ (18/7/12). This article argues that ‘[i]t is at best highly doubtful that the approach in the Mental Health Act 1983, where compulsory treatment flows from detention automatically and with limited distinct procedural and substantive safeguards, is consistent with Article 8 of the ECHR’.

The above highlights total inequality between mental health/physical health and wellbeing and that treatment given is the cheapest option under mental health keeping someone drugged for life regardless of physical health is for convenience with diagnoses given on observation of so called “symptoms” rather than question of underlying causes.

This is completely wrong and to place people like Elizabeth on a PICU ward is wrong too “I will never get well in this place – I may be coming out in a body bag” Elizabeth’s most recent words at her distress of being on yet another PICU where she is on 1-1 and cannot even make a phone call without staff listening to every word. She is followed around everywhere. This is the most restrictive care ever that Elizabeth has had but could be ordered by the local area (Enfield) for all I know who are paying vast sums of money for a stay up to 3 months. Whatever happened with “least Restrictive Care” – I attended their conference at Royal College of GPs.

When are Doctors going to take note of:

Coincidentally Risperidone is also associated with raised serum aminotransferases which in effect has the same consequences as alcohol induced fatty liver.  
 

On the last point talking therapies and hypnotherapy do have some degree of success but they take years and enormous discipline on the part of the patient. ” 

Not necessarily many would opt for this rather than drug treatment for life. Choices are not given and there is inequality under MH as compared with physical health care.


Date: 16 May 2020 at 10:11
Subject: Brain damage caused by PTSD

  • Using data from the Swedish National Patient Register and other nationwide health registers, investigators in this population-matched and sibling cohort study identified individuals first diagnosed with stress-related disorders between January 1, 1987, and December 31, 2008.
  • Exclusion criteria were history of neurodegenerative diseases, conflicting or missing data, lack of data on family links, or age 40 years or younger at study end. 
  • A matched cohort design allowed comparison of 61,748 individuals with stress-related disorders (PTSD, acute stress reaction, adjustment disorder, and other stress reactions) with the general population (595,335 matched unexposed individuals).
  • A sibling cohort allowed comparison of 44,839 individuals with stress-related disorders with their 78,482 unaffected full siblings. 
  • Follow-up began at the later of age 40 years or 5 years after the diagnosis of stress-related disorders, and concluded at the first diagnosis of a neurodegenerative disease, death, emigration, or the end of follow-up (December 31, 2013), whichever came first. 
  • The National Patient Register allowed classification of neurodegenerative diseases as primary or vascular, as well as separate analyses for AD, PD, and ALS. 
  • Median age at the start of follow-up was 47 (interquartile range, 41-56) years, and 24,323 (39.4%) of individuals with stress-related disorders were men.
  • Median duration of follow-up was 4.7 (interquartile range, 2.1-9.8) years. 
  • Risk for neurodegenerative diseases was 57% higher in persons with a stress-related disorder than in unexposed persons (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.43-1.73) in Cox proportional hazards regression models, controlling for multiple confounders.
  • Risk increase with stress-related disorder was greater for vascular neurodegenerative diseases (HR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.40-2.31) than for primary neurodegenerative diseases (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.15-1.48). 
  • Risk was statistically significantly increased for AD (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.12-1.67), but not for PD (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.98-1.47) or ALS (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.74-1.96). 
  • Findings in the sibling cohort confirmed those in the population-matched cohort.
  • Sensitivity analysis showed some attenuation of the associations after additional adjustment for cardiovascular diseases diagnosed before the end of follow-up.
  • On the basis of their findings, the investigators concluded that stress-related disorders are associated with substantially increased risk for neurodegenerative diseases later in life.
  • There was a statistically significant association of stress-related disorders with AD, but not with PD or ALS, which may partly reflect the relatively young cohort and the low incidence of PD and ALS at a younger age.
  • The observed associations were independent of multiple confounders including familial factors, based on similar results in the population-matched and sibling cohort analyses. 
  • The stronger association for vascular than for nonvascular neurodegenerative diseases suggests a potential cerebrovascular pathway.
  • The lead investigator told Medscape Medical News that finding strategies to lower the risk for cardiovascular diseases in patients with stress-related disorders may also lower future risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases. 
  • Biological mechanisms may underlie the association between stress and neurodegeneration, as chronic, repeated, or intense stress may impair the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and alter stress hormone levels.
  • Stress increases cortisol level, which may induce microglia and astrocyte activation, overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines, and oxidative stress, potentially causing chronic neuroinflammation and subsequently increasing the risk for neurodegenerative diseases.
  • Similar mechanisms may also explain the link between psychological stress and cerebrovascular impairments, and cardiovascular diseases are known to be long-term physiological health consequences of stress-related disorders. 
  • Vascular factors may therefore explain the association of stress-related disorders with neurodegenerative diseases and the relatively stronger association with vascular neurodegenerative diseases than with primary neurodegenerative diseases.
  • Vascular factors may also worsen symptoms and accelerate progression of AD; AD and vascular dementia often occur simultaneously and are difficult to distinguish clinically. 
  • Another factor contributing to the observed associations may be lifestyle changes after the diagnosis of stress-related disorders, such as increased smoking and alcohol use, substance abuse, or sleep disorders, which could increase risk for neurodegenerative diseases.
  • An expert commenting on the study for Medscape Medical News noted that poor lifestyle choices such as these could significantly affect brain and vascular health. 
  • That expert highlighted the potential for identifying those at risk for dementia based on stress disorders earlier in life, which might allow earlier interventions to try to change the brain and body’s physiological and behavioral response to stress. 
  • Educating the general population regarding these findings and their significance could help them seek the appropriate treatment for chronic stress or trauma. 
  • Study limitations include reverse causation and surveillance bias, as cognitive impairment, depressive symptoms, and other symptoms of stress-related disorders may be early signs of dementia and PD, or stress-induced decline in cognitive function may result in earlier dementia onset among patients with stress-related disorders. 
  • However, the 5-year lag time in all analyses argues against reverse causation or surveillance bias.
  • Other limitations include possible underestimation of the real association between stress-related disorders and neurodegenerative diseases, lack of validation studies for the diagnoses of stress-related disorder in the Swedish National Patient Register, insufficient statistical power for analysis of rarer outcomes such as ALS and PD, and potential residual confounding. 

Clinical Implications

  • Stress-related disorders are associated with substantially increased risk for neurodegenerative diseases later in life, based on a Swedish population-matched and sibling cohort study.
  • The stronger association for vascular than for nonvascular neurodegenerative diseases suggests a potential cerebrovascular pathway.
  • Implications for the Healthcare Team: Finding strategies to lower the risk for cardiovascular diseases in patients with stress-related disorders may lower future risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases.

The above should be taken into account when placing someone like Elizabeth who has complex PTSD on either acute ward or PICU wards which are noisy, volatile and stressful for the patient. In contrast, a care farm would be the answer – a natural environment with animals then it would be not necessary to restrain and inject causing further trauma to the patient. Consideration should be given in the UK to providing correct facilities such as this. Camphill Community Trust have good facilities where people who have learning disabilities and autism can learn new skills and work with specialist staff in therapeutic environments. Why should facilities such as this be deprived to MH patients who are misdiagnosed.